Difference Between SASL/PLAIN, SASL/SCRAM-256, SASL/SCRAM-512
The three mechanisms—SASL/PLAIN, SASL/SCRAM-256, and SASL/SCRAM-512—are authentication protocols supported by Kafka and other systems, with varying levels of security.
SASL/PLAIN
-
What It Is: A simple username and password authentication mechanism.
-
How It Works: Credentials are transmitted in plaintext (just a basic challenge-response) unless wrapped in TLS/SSL encryption.
-
Security:
-
Vulnerable if used without encrypted transport (TLS/SSL), because passwords could be intercepted by attackers on the network.
-
Storing credentials may also be insecure unless managed carefully.
-
-
Best Practice: Should only be used together with TLS/SSL to encrypt the connection, minimizing exposure to password sniffing.automq+3
SASL/SCRAM-256 (SCRAM-SHA-256)
-
What It Is: Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism using SHA-256 hashing.
-
How It Works:
-
Passwords are never transmitted directly. Instead, authentication uses the SCRAM protocol, which protects against replay attacks and sniffing.
-
Passwords are not stored in plain text—they’re salted and hashed using SHA-256, making it far more secure, even if an attacker compromises the authentication database.
-
-
Security: Strong protection against network sniffing, password interception, and dictionary attacks. More robust than PLAIN.confluent+4
-
Best Practice: Recommended for secure production environments. SCRAM credentials are stored hashed and salted.
SASL/SCRAM-512 (SCRAM-SHA-512)
-
What It Is: SCRAM protocol using the even stronger SHA-512 hash function.
-
How It Works:
-
Functions identically to SCRAM-SHA-256, but uses the SHA-512 hashing algorithm, which is computationally more secure.
-
Recommended when you want best-in-class security for password-based authentication.
-
-
Security: Offers higher cryptographic strength than SCRAM-SHA-256 and is considered more resistant to brute-force attacks.github+5
-
Best Practice: Use when maximum available password protection is required.
Comparison Table
| Mechanism | Password Sent in Plain? | Requires TLS/SSL | Password Storage | Hash Algorithm | Security Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SASL/PLAIN | Yes (unless TLS) | Recommended | Plain or callback | None | Basic |
| SASL/SCRAM-256 | No | Optional | Salted, hashed | SHA-256 | Strong |
| SASL/SCRAM-512 | No | Optional | Salted, hashed | SHA-512 | Very Strong |
Key Takeaways
-
SASL/PLAIN: Easiest to set up, but least secure if not using TLS/SSL.
-
SASL/SCRAM-256 & SASL/SCRAM-512: Much stronger security, no plaintext passwords transmitted or stored, with additional protection from cryptographic hashing and salting.
-
SHA-512 (SCRAM-512) is stronger than SHA-256 (SCRAM-256), recommended for critical or regulated environments.
In general, SASL/SCRAM-256 or SASL/SCRAM-512 should be preferred over SASL/PLAIN for any scenario where security is important.aiven+4